| |||
| |||
NOTICE: The page below has been permenently FROZEN as of January 2000. Due to resource limitations, this section of our website is no longer maintained, so some links may not work and some information may be out of date. We have retained this page for archive reference only, and we cannot vouch for its accuracy. Broken links will not be repaired, and minor errors will not be corrected. You are responsible for independently verifying any information you may find here.
|
NOTE: Former webmaster Glenn Campbell
has two new websites, active in 2007: FamilyCourtChronicles.com and RoamingPhotos.com. Check them out! |
|
From: joel slayton <joel@well.com> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 1997 07:36:38 -0800 Subject: Update: Landscape Painting as Counter-Surveillance of Area 51 |
http://cadre.sjsu.edu/area210 landscape painting as counter-surveillance of Area 51 -sjsu cadre institute- As you may know, on April 25th 1997 a team of twenty artists from San Jose State Universityís CADRE institute (Computers in Art and Design/Research and Education) coordinated by Professor Joel Slayton staged a site specific work addressing surveillance, conspiracy theory and art at the perimeter entrance to Groom Lake. The project is currently on exhibition at the Area 51 Research Center in Rachel, Nevada and contextualized on the internet. Project summary: The strategy was to stage a conceptually based site work utilizing landscape painting as an action of counter-surveillance. The artists arrived by caravan along a dirt road entrance to Groom Lake and under constant surveillance by camo-dudes using high focal length binoculars, what was clearly sound surveillance and some very wierd electronics aimed at. Pre-prepared easels and canvases were transported to a bluff overlook fifty meters from the actual perimeter. Artists were positioned in a row perpendicular to the perimeter providing for a direct view into Area 51. Over a period of five hours individual paintings of the selected motif were realize with no intervention from the camo-dudes. Although, a very silent black helicopter circled overhead for some time a low altitude. The final installation of easels and paintings were positioned as a sculptural manifestation atop the bluff. The site was documented and then transported to the Area 51 Research Center where they are on display and for sale with 51% of all proceeds going to the Research Center. A feature video documentary of the event is being produced encompassing all elements leading, comprising of the artwork and continued contextualization and fallout from our provocation. Interesting Updates: The project web site http://cadre.sjsu.edu/area210 includes documentation on Professor Slayton's connection with the CIA, an analysis of the Michael Hezier, a reknown american modern artist, secret compound adjancent to Area 51, documentation of helicopter surveillance, resultes of a message spam of Nellis Airforce Base personell and much more. The site also support project documentation and ordering information for the paintings (significant artifacts of the conspiracty/surveillance surrounding area Area 51). Art is a good investment and this is the best kind of art in that regard. (see ZOE below) Problems with the FBI. In early June the FBI contacted San Jose State University Office of Computing and Information Systems seeking clarification of the project as it relates to Area 51 and Nellis Airforce Base. At issue was the fact that one of our group had obtained an email list for Nellis AFB, including all military officers. The email list was used in a spam marketing strategy to direclty inform as many individuals at Nellis AFB about our project, intentions and the paintings for sale. The FBI was also interested about our future intentions regarding exploration of Nellis AFB and Area 51 (which they mentioned by name). It was conveyed that the project would continue to evolve, based upon involvment and stimulus of interest, such as theirs, and that it was impossible to predict the final outcome. At some length, the function of conceptual art was explored. Subsequent Surveillance: Joel Slayton reported to the project group that a black four door sedan with two individuals using cell phones was repeatedly parked outside of his house on serveral occasions during the next week. At the end of June Mr. Slayton was notified by the IRS of its intention to audit his tax returns for explication of deductions pertaining to his professional activities as an artist. Michael Heizer in duress: In another development, an attorney for Michael Heizer, who owns property adjacent to Area 51 and who has been producing a highly secrative land work there, contacted San Jose State University demanding cessation of any references to him on the project Web site. Several members of the project group had tresspassed on his property seeking Mr. Heizer for a personal interview and were now being threatened with prosecution unless his demands were met. It was indicated that Mr. Heizer was suffering from severe psychological duress as a result of investigation of him and alleged conceptual correlations of his professional work as an artist with Area 51. This apparently disturbed him greatly. He was also very upset that a map to his secret compound was published by our site. Although we sympathize with Mr. Heizer's desire for autonomy, the fact is he is a well known public figure in the arts and is not therefore exempt from analysis or parody. He may not like at all the correlations that were made about him and his work, but that is the function of critical discourse in the arts and is a serious function of art itself. That his role is heightened, without his permission, in the phenomena associated with Area 51 exemplifies the nature of conspiracty theory and information strategy addressed by this project. This in no way disputes that his property was tresspassed. This legal dispute has not as yet been resolved. The issue escalated beyond San Jose State University to legal representation by California State Univerisity Chancellors Office. They are now exploring first admendment rights as they relate to issues of privacy, identity and art-of-the-internet. Summary: Landscape Painting as Counter-Surveillance of Area 51 will continue to evolve. A documentary produced for French Television aired in July and featuring the project and the artists involved. Oneof our entourage, ZOE, a 3 year old female protege artist, was featured. ZOE's work was the first painting from the exhibition purchased on-line by a Stanford University affilicated research scientist. Because of the high visiblity of this project, this painting is now valued at over $3000. Should you buy a painting? Landscape Painting as Counter-Surveillance of Area 51 will be included in a forth coming book examining the phenemona of surviellance in contemporary culture and Area 51 by Phil Patton. For information contact: area210@cadre.sjsu.edu
Index: Area 51 in Popular Culture
|
Created: