| |||
| |||
NOTICE: The page below has been permenently FROZEN as of January 2000. Due to resource limitations, this section of our website is no longer maintained, so some links may not work and some information may be out of date. We have retained this page for archive reference only, and we cannot vouch for its accuracy. Broken links will not be repaired, and minor errors will not be corrected. You are responsible for independently verifying any information you may find here.
|
NOTE: Former webmaster Glenn Campbell
has two new websites, active in 2007: FamilyCourtChronicles.com and RoamingPhotos.com. Check them out! |
|
From: "Jeffrey S. Kane" Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 12:19:25 -0800 Subject: Three Discrepencies in Corso Book |
I read a copy of Corso's book as soon as it was released. I'm impressed by his credentials, found his story fascinating, and find it hard to believe that someone with such a distinguished career would publish a hoax at this stage of his life. However, despite wanting to believe what he has to say, I've found a number of discrepancies in the book that I would have to have resolved before I could invest any credulity in his story. These have not been brought out in any source I have yet run across. I'd like to bring them to your attention in the hope that you might be able to assist me in contacting him in a collaborative effort to get these problems resolved. There are three glaring discrepancies, as follows. First, and most seriously, on p. 106 and again on p. 116 he mentions John Von Neumann as someone whom he and General Trudeau intended to consult on the integrated circuit chips found among the crash debris. The plan to consult this famous mathematician was formulated during Corso's tenure at the Air Force Office of Foreign Technology R&D in 1961. Unfortunately, Von Neumann died in Washington, D.C. in March of 1957. The repeated explicit mention of the intention to consult Von Neumann suggests more than a mere memory lapse. To me, this discrepancy alone calls Corso's whole credibility into question. Second, he explicitly describes the alien bodies as having four fingered hands in several places (e.g., p. 32), but then later on writes this: "And when reporters were actually given truthful descriptions of alien encounters, they either fell on the floor laughing or sold the story to the tabloids, who'd print a drawing of a large-headed, almond-eyed, SIX-FINGERED (emphasis added) alien. Again, everybody laughed. But that's what these things really look like because I saw the one they trucked up to Wright Field." (p. 78) Was he influenced by seeing the alien autopsy film? This discrepancy also seems serious and needs to be explained. Third, with all the incredibly tight security reported to have surrounded the crash retrieval and shipment of bodies to Wright-Patterson AFB, he wants us to believe that he waltzed into this unguarded building at midnight when he was at Ft. Riley, pried open a crate containing an alien body in a glass storage cylinder, and was never detected? I have a few other problems with some of his assertions, but I'll let the about three suffice for now.
Ufomind Index: Philip Corso
|
Created: