Archive Index Area 51 Mailing List Archive Ufomind

Nukes still at the ready [news via INN]

From: campbell@ufomind.com (Glenn Campbell, Las Vegas)
Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 13:13:16 -0800
Subject: Nukes still at the ready [news via INN]

Via: Steve1957@aol.com, Intercepts Net News

By ROBERT BURNS
.c The Associated Press

    GROVER, Colo. (May 4) - In a sealed capsule 100 feet beneath the flat,
barren plain in north-central Colorado, Air Force Capt. Xavier Chavez stands
ready for war. His weapons: 10 nuclear-armed intercontinental ballistic
missiles whose awesome killing power can be unleashed with a flick of the
wrist.

    Nuclear warriors? These days?

    Much has been made of the demise of the Cold War and, with it, the end of
a decades-long U.S.-Soviet nuclear standoff. Less noticed is the fact that
the U.S. Air Force still has its missiles cocked and ready for a potential
nuclear conflict.

    The Pentagon also is quietly investing billions to modernize the missile
force even as some say the time is fast approaching to eliminate the entire
ICBM arsenal.

    ''It's a big deal, because it's our national security,'' Chavez says as
he and his partner, 2nd Lt. Jerome White, wind up a 24-hour subterranean
shift monitoring the electronic pulse of triple-warhead Minuteman III nuclear
missiles.

    ''Some people may find that kind of corny, but we have to take it
seriously,'' says Chavez, 32, looking all business in his blue Air Force jump
suit.

    To watch Chavez and White at their launch control panels is to know they
take their work seriously. Although no nuclear missile has ever been launched
other than for testing, it is their duty to ensure their weapons are ready
should the call ever come. They make clear they dearly hope it never does.

    ''Sometimes when it gets quiet in here you think about that,'' Chavez
says. ''You ask yourself, could you do it? It's something in every crew
member's mind.'' He quickly adds that he is sure he could flip the switch if
ordered.

    Under a 1994 U.S.-Russian agreement the two nations no longer aim their
long-range nuclear missiles at each other. America's missiles are set on a
trajectory that ends in the ocean, but that is not as comforting as it may
sound. Pre-programmed wartime targets are kept in the missiles' memory banks
and can be swapped for the ocean targets in 10 seconds. Same for the Russian
missiles.

    To actually launch an ICBM, a ''hot time,'' or launch time, must be
entered by computer and the missile then ''enabled'' - akin to cocking a
revolver before squeezing its trigger. In the final step, Chavez and the
crewmate seated beside him would turn their dual keys in unison, as would two
officers from a second capsule. Once all four had done so, there would be no
stopping the launch.

    Keeping the most powerful weapons ever devised at the razor's edge of
readiness is not cheap. The Brookings Institution, a think tank in
Washington, D.C., calculates from Defense Department budget data that it
costs more than $800 million a year to operate and maintain the full fleet of
ICBMs.

    The Pentagon is investing $5 billion on a missile modernization program
to extend the Minuteman IIIs' useful lives to 2020. It already has spent $650
million to install a new computer system inside the launch capsules, and it
intends to replace the Minuteman III guidance and propulsion systems over the
next several years.

    Chavez and the 280 other ICBM crewmembers of the 90th Missile Wing don't
think of themselves as merely babysitters of these weapons of mass
destruction.

    On a recent morning at their weapons stations inside the buried capsule
that Chavez likens to a ''hollowed-out watermelon,'' he and White were in
almost constant motion, using their newly modernized computer consoles to
conduct routine checks of the alarms and sensors that keep the site secure.
They also were in contact with other capsule crews and with security police
topside.

    ''There is no room for complacency,'' Chavez says.

    Inside the climate-controlled launch capsule there is no sense that these
military personnel are anticipating nuclear war. Far from it. In the calm
professionalism of Chavez and other missileers - as they call themselves -
there is a quiet confidence, a practiced precision, a work-a-day approach
they believe will keep nuclear war at bay.

    ''We're the biggest kid on the block,'' says Capt. Scott Sanders, a
soft-spoken launch control officer who has been operating ICBMs in the 90th
Missile Wing for 3 1/2 years. ''Its a deterrent - you hope nobody wants to
mess with us.''

    Nuclear war may be less likely now than during the Cold War, but the Air
Force sees no sense in scrapping the 550 ICBMs it operates from underground
silos in Montana, North Dakota, Wyoming, Colorado and Nebraska. Two hundred
of those are operated by Chavez's unit, the 90th Missile Wing based at F.E.
Warren Air Force Base, Wyo.

    The ICBMs form one leg of the military's ''triad'' of nuclear forces. The
other legs are Air Force B-52 and B-2 bombers and the Navy's Trident nuclear
submarines.

    Bruce Blair, a former missileer and now a nuclear expert at the Brookings
Institution, says that as arms control treaties further reduce the U.S.
nuclear arsenal the favored weapon to keep will be the Navy's sub-based
missiles.

    ''The ICBM will come under increasing pressure to go away,'' Blair says.

    The Air Force's arsenal already is shrinking. As a result of the 1991
Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty the ICBM force was reduced from 1,000
missiles and 2,450 warheads to today's total of about 550 missiles with 2,000
warheads.

    If the 1993 START II accord is ratified by the Russian parliament, the
Air Force will eliminate its most modern ICBM, the 10-warhead Peacekeeper,
and convert the three-warhead Minuteman III missiles to single-warhead
missiles. The end result would be a force of 500 missiles and 500 warheads.

    Even more of the missiles might be eliminated if, as proposed by
President Clinton and President Boris Yeltsin at their Helsinki summit in
March, a third START agreement is negotiated and put into effect early in the
21st century.

    Not surprisingly, the Air Force officers who manage the missile force
argue that it makes a unique and critical contribution to the nation's
security.

    ''There is still in Russia the (nuclear) capability to destroy the United
States,'' says Col. Tucker Fagan, vice commander of the 20th Air Force, which
oversees the entire ICBM force.

    Fagan says missileers like Chavez are regularly reminded of this and told
that ICBMs are a kind of insurance policy against the possibility that
Russia's experiment in democracy goes bad. Yet he acknowledges that the
missile crews also understand that the days of the ICBM force may be
numbered.

    ''Does that play on their brains? I'm sure it does,'' Fagan says.

    Yet morale is high, says Col. Roger Burg, commander of the 90th
Operations Group at F.E. Warren. He tells his troops that although their work
is sometimes mundane and rarely rewarded with public attention, they should
see themselves as warriors, as the ultimately defenders of the American
homeland.

    Burg bristles at the suggestion he and his crews are removed from the
risk of combat.

    ''Me, I'm either here or somebody is inhaling my ashes in Minneapolis,''
he says.



[ This Month's Index | Archive Main Index | UFO UpDates Mailing List ]
[ Area 51 | UFO Topics | Ufomind What's New | Top Level ]

Area 51 Mailing List - Standards and General Information

Sponsored by the Area 51 Research Center. Moderated by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact: webmaster@ufomind.com

Financial support for this web server is provided by the Research Center Catalog.