NOTICE: The page below has been permenently FROZEN as of January 2000. Due to resource limitations, this section of our website is no longer maintained, so some links may not work and some information may be out of date. We have retained this page for archive reference only, and we cannot vouch for its accuracy. Broken links will not be repaired, and minor errors will not be corrected. You are responsible for independently verifying any information you may find here.

NOTE: Former webmaster Glenn Campbell has two new websites, active in 2007: FamilyCourtChronicles.com and RoamingPhotos.com. Check them out!

Is B-2 an anti-gravity craft? Boylan/McIntosh debate

[Below are claims relayed by Richard Boylan that the B-2 stealth bomber
is an anti-gravity craft.  These are followed by an exchange between
Boylan and aviation watcher Rich McIntosh.]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 17:14:07 -0500 (CDT)
From: rich.boylan@24stex.com
Subject: More on B-2 Stealth bomber as antigravity craft
To: iufo@world.std.com; Skywatch@wic.net; and all interested parties
Date: 09/20/97
[Via erik@crossfields.com]

        Retired Air Force Colonel Donald Ware has passed on to me information
from a three-star general he knows who revealed to him in July that "the new
Lockheed-Martin space shuttle [National Space Plane] and the B-2 [Stealth
bomber] both have electro-gravitic systems on board;" and that " this explains
why our 21 Northrup B-2s cost about a billion dollars each."
Thus, after taking off conventionally, the B-2 can switch to antigravity mode,
and, I have heard, fly around the world without refueling.

        I have also heard, and deduced for myself after inspecting a Stealth
F-117A fighter at Beale Air Force Base, that the F-117A _also_ has hybrid
propulsion and lift technologies, utilizing conventional thrust for public
take-offs and landings, but switching to antigravity mode for extended cruising
range, for lightning-fast maneuverability, and for shrouding the airframe in
invisibility (by having its local counter-gravity field bend light around the
airframe). The notorious extremely-unstable lift and forward-motion of the
F-117A is merely temporary, until it moves into antigravity mode, where
independent field propulsion provides stability. {Unfortunately for the pilot
who went down in an air show over Maryland, his Stealth fighter was in
conventional jet- thrust mode at the time.)

        Further commentary, revealing that the government eventually plans to
release antigravity technology publicly, is provided by Colonel Ware.
"Apparently this highly controlled military program was used to gain experience
with 4th-density technology that may transform civil aviation after all
national leaders choose peace."

        In a perhaps unrelated aside, Colonel Ware stated that his two brothers
are on a list to receive free electricity machines by United Community Services
of America (UCSA) in New Jersey. "They [UCSA] claim to have produced 50,000
machines and are preparing to install them on selected homes. They say they
will provide free electricity to the home owner and sell the excess power to
the power company."  Col. Ware adds cryptically, "I wonder if this
environmentally-friendly technology is associated in any way with alien
liaison."

                                                Richard Boylan, Ph.D.



  Richard Boylan, Ph.D. 2826 O Street, Suite 2, Sacramento, CA 95816, USA.
(916) 455-0120 E-mail: rich.boylan@24stex.com ; Primary website:
www.ufonetwork.com/boylan/  Author: Close Extraterrestrial Encounters, Labored
Journey To The Stars and Project Epiphany.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 08:52:53 -0700
From: Rich McIntosh <Rich.McIntosh@ci.sj.ca.us>
To: rich.boylan@24stex.com
CC: campbell@ufomind.com
Subject: Feedback from Web site

[To Boylan:]

After reading your assertions regarding the B-2, F-117 etc. and their
alleged Anti-gravity devices it would appear that you lack an
understanding of aeronautics and basic flight characteristics.  First
and foremost the B2 is an adaptation of 1950's design that is not
aerodynamically stable.  4 sets of computers stabilize the thing.  The
Air Force does not have that much faith in the plane.  With active
squadrons operational during the Gulf War the Air Force did not send any
B-2's to the Gulf.  It is not that red hot an airplane as witnessed by
the recent revalations regarding rain/moisture that would interfer with
its masking systems.  If you coupled Government contract administration
with Northrup's past habit of cost overruns and brand new technology and
Ronald Reagan administration's oversight concern's it really doesn't
take too much imagination to envision a billion dollar aircraft.

Many of the same arguments can be made for and against the F-117.  These
planes are clearly less manuervable and lack the speed of modern jets.
Their prime defense is their tiny radar cross section.  Nothing more
Lockheed can build aircraft and given available resources, produced a
more viable plane than did Northrup.  You offer abosolutely no proof
other than 3rd hand information and your own observations on the F117.
When you were at Beale for the airshow last Saturday (9-20) how close
did you get to the aircraft and what did you observe to indicate to you
that there was some sort of gravity device aboard.  How would you
recognize this brand new technology?  I suspect at some time in the
future mankind will mess around with gravity and be successful at it.
Like the B-2, the F-117 is new technology that isn't completely
understood yet.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 09:24:32 -0700
From: Rich McIntosh <Rich.McIntosh@ci.sj.ca.us>
Reply-To: Rich.McIntosh@ci.sj.ca.us
To: webmaster@ufomind.com
Subject: Anti-gravity devices

Pasted below are copies of recent exchanges between Dr. Boylan and
myself.  After I read his stuff regarding anti-gravity devices, I got a
bit out of joint because of the lack of credible information he was
passing along as fact.  I realize it is somewhat wordy but I thought you
might be interested not only his responses but what he selelcted to
respond to.  If you choose to you may reprint any of this you have my
permission to do so.  I somehow did not save the entire text of the
first message I sent to Dr. Boylan but the portion he snips captures the
gist of my letter.I like to think highly educated people think things
through more thoroughly than people like myself who are certainly less
educated.

-------------

 "Again sir  you offer third hand information with no facts.  Your
argument is easily applied to your assertions. I believe there are other
forms of life out there somewhere. I believe we should actively pursue
any and all information regarding this.  I also know that had you
applied this same form of logic you currently use when writing your
doctoral thesis,   you would not have the respect and honor that a Ph.D.
deserves.  An unnamed three star is not proof. It is hearsay.  I have no
set agenda sir.  I stand ready to be convinced.  Your trip to an air
show coupled with a few assertions from an unnamed third party requires
examination.  There may very well be anti-gravity devices on board these
aircraft.  I am a former Air Traffic Controller and have observed these
aircraft when they are well away from the view of the public.  Your
giant leap of logic from hearsay to fact proved nothing.  It could even
be said you have your own agenda.  That is you feel certain there are
these devices and will grab at the slightest shred of evidence that they
exist.  In doing this you overlook a great deal of information that
makes suggestions to the contrary.

> >>> WPOMASTR.PMDF."rich.boylan@24stex.com" 09/24/97 09:33am >>>
>
>  > After reading your assertions regarding the B-2, F-117 etc. and
>  > their
>  > alleged Anti-gravity devices it would appear that you lack an
>  > understanding of aeronautics and basic flight characteristics.
>  > First
>  > and foremost the B2 is an adaptation of 1950's design that is not
>  > aerodynamically stable.  4 sets of computers stabilize the thing.
>
> Mr. McIntosh,
>
>         You are, of course, free to accept or decline to accept the revelations
> of the three-star general (relayed by my acquaintance. Col. Don Ware) that the
> B-2 Stealth Bomber has antigravity technology aboard.
>         Arguing with me suggests that you have set for yourself the agenda of
> changing my mind about whether I should believe Col. Ware and the General who
> leaked him this former secret. FYI, nothing you have said is dissuasive.
>         Have you worked on classified aerospace projects with Ultra Top Secret
> clearance? Can a person know what he doesn't know?
>
>                                         Richard Boylan, Ph.D.

From Rich McIntosh to Dr. Boylan,

PS- I have had a top secret clearance in the past and there is no such
thing as an "ultra top secret" clearance.  Clearance's are not
classified that way.

>>> WPOMASTR.PMDF."rich.boylan@24stex.com" 09/24/97 09:33am >>>

 > After reading your assertions regarding the B-2, F-117 etc. and
 > their
 > alleged Anti-gravity devices it would appear that you lack an
 > understanding of aeronautics and basic flight characteristics.
 > First
 > and foremost the B2 is an adaptation of 1950's design that is not
 > aerodynamically stable.  4 sets of computers stabilize the thing.

Mr. McIntosh,

        You are, of course, free to accept or decline to accept therevelations
of the three-star general (relayed by my acquaintance. Col. Don Ware) that the
B-2 Stealth Bomber has antigravity technology aboard.
        Arguing with me suggests that you have set for yourself the agenda of
changing my mind about whether I should believe Col. Ware and the General who
leaked him this former secret. FYI, nothing you have said is dissuasive.
        Have you worked on classified aerospace projects with Ultra Top
Secret clearance? Can a person know what he doesn't know?

                                        Richard Boylan, Ph.D.


---------------------

[From McIntosh]

How does one know what one does not know?  This sort of thing is of
great interest to me.  I find that when people such as yourself are
confronted you fold the tents and leave.  You do not have data sir, you
have third hand information you have not and cannot examine.  You accept
information from those whose agenda you don't question yet question
people like myself and then refuse to elaborate.  You then under the
guise of a Ph. D lend credibility to ideas whose validity is
questionable.

argumentation-"the act or process of forming reasons and drawing
conclusions and applying them to a case in discussion".

>>> WPOMASTR.PMDF."rich.boylan@24stex.com" 09/24/97 08:48pm >>>


 > PS- I have had a top secret clearance in the past and there is no
 > such
 > thing as an "ultra top secret" clearance.  Clearance's are not
 > classified
 > that way.

Mr. McIntosh,

        Those who have such clearances, (the very existence of which is
classified), have advised me of such clearances.
        I have no interest in argumentation with you. If you disbelieve
thedata, pass on to something more of your interest on the internet.

                                        Richard Boylan, Ph.D.


Index: Richard Boylan
Index: Alien Sources for Human Technology