NOTICE: The page below has been permenently FROZEN as of January 2000. Due to resource limitations, this section of our website is no longer maintained, so some links may not work and some information may be out of date. We have retained this page for archive reference only, and we cannot vouch for its accuracy. Broken links will not be repaired, and minor errors will not be corrected. You are responsible for independently verifying any information you may find here.

NOTE: Former webmaster Glenn Campbell has two new websites, active in 2007: FamilyCourtChronicles.com and RoamingPhotos.com. Check them out!

Re: Lazar Theory #1; Friedman on Lazar [3 msgs]

[From UFOR mailing list via Ndunlks@aol.com]

From:   d005734c@dc.seflin.org (Francisco Lopez)
Date: 97-09-28 01:53:32 EDT

From: Stanton Friedman <fsphys@brunnet.net>

> I wonder why some people have an emotional and angry reaction against him.
> i have never hears any argument against him that held up.

Sorry but the facts are clear. There is no evidence that any of Bob's
claims are true and much that they are not. MIT and Cal Tech never heard
of him. He did take some courses at Pierce Junior College in So. Calif at
the same time he was supposedly going to MIT near Boston. He didn't work
for Los Alamos, he worked for a subcontractor. He finished in the bottom
3rd of his high school class, graduating in August not June, having taken
only one science course, chemistry . He could never have been admitted to
MIT or Cal Tech.

How is it that Patricia knows he has made no money from his videos, the
Testor model etc? His 115 scheme won't work. The stuff would be
radioactive, he couldn't have obtained any. ad nauseum ad nauseum. A
diploma or 2 would have been nice sometime in the last 8 years?? The prof
he said would recall him from CIT, never taught there, only at Pierce.
Please get facts in hand before putting word processor in gear.

Stan Friedman

=======================================================================

From: Dave Bethke <bethland@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: bethland@ix.netcom.com
To: campbell@ufomind.com
Subject: Lazar Theory #1

I was suprised to read your theory. Surprised that you moved away from
the always neutral "librarian" ground, <g> and suprised that the Bigelow
funding for Zeta Reticuli 2, Inc. may have been more than a token thing
and as you theorize, may be the motive for the whole S-4 story.  The
lack of motive for the hoax has always bothered me, along with the
regular Wednesday night test viewing where the saucers appeared with
clocklike precision.  Your Theory #1 seems a very probable answer to my
first sticking point.

=======================================================================

X-Sender: psyspy@vegas.infi.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 15:47:06 -0800
To: akazero@pe.net, tmahood@ibm.net (Tom Mahood), rangerdd@aol.com
From: campbell@ufomind.com (Glenn Campbell, Las Vegas)
Subject: Re: Stolen radio signals

>> So....just exactly WHICH USGS radio signals were you planning to steal and
>> what were you going to do with them??

This is a smoking gun that points directly at Hular.

I _did_ attempt to steal USGS signals within the first few months
of my arrival, and I did write such a letter, but it was sent only
to John Andrews, Jim Goodall and Lazar (via Hular).  I don't think I
sent it to Knapp or Lear. It was a friendly attempt to solicit Lazar's
technical expertise.

The USGS signals were from the seismic monitor on Queen City Summit,
in direct line with the Groom Lake runway.  If you monitored the
continuous signal from it, you might be able to detect the earthshaking
"Aurora" passing overhead.

Yup, "Marsha Spader" is Hular!

Glenn


Index: Bob Lazar